General News
Why is economic liberalism so taboo in socially liberal Brazil?
From The Economist print edition
Liberalism in Brazil
The almost-lost cause of freedom
Why is economic liberalism so taboo in socially liberal Brazil?
“ADMITTING to liberalism explicitly,” wrote Roberto Campos, a
Brazilian politician, diplomat and swimmer against the tide who died in
2001, “is as outlandish in a country with a dirigiste culture as having
sex in public.” His observation still holds for Brazil, where economic
liberals (in the British, free-market sense, not the socialistic
American one) are as scarce as snowflakes. Government revenue as a
share of GDP has risen steadily in the past decade, and is now closer
to the level in rich European countries than that of Brazil’s
middle-income peers. Despite this, none of the likely candidates in the
presidential election due in October talks about cutting taxes. The two
leading candidates are both on the tax-and-spend centre-left.
Brazil’s shortage of economic liberals is even stranger given the
country’s history. In Chile economic liberalism was tainted by
association with military rule. But Brazil’s 1964-85 military
dictatorship chose an economic model built around state planning and
restricted imports. It is necessary to go back to the 19th century,
when Brazil’s then monarchy was briefly in thrall to Scottish
economists, to find something like classical liberalism there.
One reason why liberals have been so muted since Brazil became a
democracy again is that voting in elections is compulsory. This means
that a large number of poor voters, who pay little tax but benefit from
government welfare spending, help to push the parties in the direction
of a bigger state. If the same system were to be applied to America,
the Democrats might well enjoy a permanent majority.
Presented by Real Trade: 1/29/2010